Your unfair advantage in the USMLE, PANCE and MCAT
The medical exams are long, and so is the road to them. Biochemistry from your first year, microbiology from your second and the management algorithms from your clerkships all have to be there at once, in the order a vignette happens to ask for them.
The advantage isn't a shortcut. It's a study method: pulling answers from memory and reviewing them just before they fade, instead of rereading, highlighting and cramming.
4 programs · 5,263 cards · organised by public exam outlines
What your memory has to carry for the USMLE, PANCE and MCAT
Different exams, the same problem: a lot to hold, for a long time, recalled on demand.
Years of layered material
Pathways, bugs, drugs and their mechanisms, learned in one year and tested in another.
Discriminating details
The one lab finding or buzzword that separates two diagnoses that otherwise look the same.
Next-best-step logic
For Step 2 CK and PANCE, knowing the order of management, not just the disease.
Why the old way fails for the USMLE, PANCE and MCAT
Rereading, highlighting and cramming are the most common ways to study, and they feel productive. The research says they're the weakest.
Rereading
Rereading a review book cover to cover makes every page feel familiar by the third pass. In the study below, rereaders were ahead at five minutes and behind a week later.
Retrieve it
Tested students recalled 61% of a passage a week later; students who reread it four times recalled 40%.
Roediger & Karpicke (2006), Psychological Science
Highlighting
When most of the page is highlighted, highlighting has stopped telling you what to study next.
Test yourself
A review of ten techniques rated highlighting and rereading low utility, and practice testing high.
Dunlosky et al. (2013), Psychological Science in the Public Interest
Cramming
A dedicated period spent re-covering everything tends to peak early subjects too soon and late subjects too late. Spacing spreads the reviews to where each fact needs them.
Space it
Word pairs reviewed across four days were recalled 54% of the time; the stack crammed the day before the test, 34%.
Kornell (2009), Applied Cognitive Psychology
The numbers behind the method
Published finding about the method, not NoReread results. Each one is shown with the conditions it was measured under.
recalled a week later: tested vs reread
Vignettes force you to produce the fact. Retrieval practice rehearses exactly that.
Undergraduates studied a prose passage. Those who read it once and recalled it three times remembered 61% of it one week later; those who read it four times remembered 40%. At five minutes the rereaders were ahead (83% vs 71%). Experiment 2, 180 students, no feedback.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
Published finding about the method, not NoReread results.
assessments of spaced vs massed practice, reviewed together
Across hundreds of studies, the best gap between reviews grows with how long you need to remember. Medicine needs years.
A quantitative review of 839 assessments in 317 experiments (184 articles) on verbal recall. Spaced learning beat massed, and the gap between sessions that produced the best retention grew as the retention interval grew.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354–380.
Published finding about the method, not NoReread results.
recalled a week later: kept testing vs only restudied
Getting a card right once is not the finish line. Continuing to retrieve it is what held up a week later.
College students learned 40 Swahili–English word pairs. Pairs that kept being tested after first recall were recalled about 80% of the time a week later; pairs dropped from testing but restudied, 36%.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966–968.
Published finding about the method, not NoReread results.
See the research
Three short loops. Two chart published results exactly as reported; the forgetting curve is an illustrative model and is labelled as one.
Testing yourself beats rereading, a week later
Bar charts from Roediger & Karpicke (2006), Experiment 2. Five minutes after studying, students who read a passage four times recalled 83%, read three times and tested once 78%, read once and tested three times 71%. One week later the order reversed: 40%, 56% and 61%.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
Published finding about the method, not NoReread results.
The forgetting curve, with and without reviews
An illustrative model, not measured data: after one exposure, memory decays quickly toward zero over 30 days. With reviews on days 1, 3, 7 and 14, each review restores it and it decays more slowly each time, staying high at day 30.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Über das Gedächtnis. Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig.
Illustrative model, not measured data.
Spacing beats cramming
From Kornell (2009), Experiment 2: over four days, one stack of 20 word pairs reviewed every day versus four stacks of five each crammed on one day. On day 5, spaced pairs were recalled 54% of the time, massed 21%, and the stack crammed the day before 34%. Across three experiments spacing beat massing for 90% of participants, yet after the first session 72% believed massing worked better.
Kornell, N. (2009). Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1297–1317.
Published finding about the method, not NoReread results.
Medicine programs
Ready-made decks, organised by each exam's public outline. Open any program to try its free sample cards.
USMLE Step 1
14 decks · 1,546 cards
USMLE Step 2 CK
14 decks · 881 cards
PANCE
15 decks · 1,319 cards
MCAT
8 decks · 1,517 cards
| Exam | Questions | Time |
|---|---|---|
| USMLE Step 1Up to 280 items across 14 blocks · Up to 8 hours in one day | Up to 280 items across 14 blocks | Up to 8 hours in one day |
| USMLE Step 2 CKUp to 318 items across 16 blocks · Up to 9 hours in one day | Up to 318 items across 16 blocks | Up to 9 hours in one day |
| PANCE300 items · 5 hours of testing (plus scheduled break time) | 300 items | 5 hours of testing (plus scheduled break time) |
| MCAT230 items (59 + 53 + 59 + 59 across sections) · About 7.5 hours seated (6 hours 15 minutes of testing) | 230 items (59 + 53 + 59 + 59 across sections) | About 7.5 hours seated (6 hours 15 minutes of testing) |
How NoReread puts it to work
1. Cards from public exam outlines
Each program is organised by its exam's publicly available outline, so the decks follow the structure you will be tested on.
2. Recall first, then flip
Every card asks before it tells. That moment of pulling the answer from memory is the retrieval practice the research measures.
3. Reviews scheduled before you forget
An SM-2 schedule brings each card back just as it starts to fade: sooner if you missed it, later if you knew it.
Each card is a single retrievable fact, such as a mechanism or a first-line drug. You attempt it before you see the answer, and cards you miss come back sooner, so the review load follows what you actually forget rather than the order of the book.
What is the minimum symptom duration and count required to diagnose a major depressive episode (MDD)?
At least 5 of 9 SIG E CAPS symptoms (including depressed mood or anhedonia) present for ≥2 weeks, causing functional impairment.
Learn first, then retain.
Flashcards are a memory tool. Learn the material first, then use NoReread to retain it and refresh what you already know. It doesn't replace studying the subject.
Cards are created from publicly available sources and may contain errors. Check anything you rely on against your official materials.
Straight answers
Is NoReread enough to prepare for the USMLE, PANCE and MCAT?
No, and we won't pretend otherwise. Flashcards are a memory tool. Learn the material first, then use NoReread to retain it and refresh what you already know. It doesn't replace studying the subject.
What does “unfair advantage” mean here?
The advantage is the study method: retrieval practice and spaced review, instead of rereading, highlighting and cramming. It is not a promise of a pass or a score. The numbers on this page are published findings about the method from the studies cited, not NoReread results.
Is this a replacement for my review books, question banks or program?
No. Those teach and test the material. NoReread is for holding onto what you have already learned, in short daily sessions.
Are the cards written by physicians?
The cards are created from publicly available sources, organised by each exam's public outline. They may contain errors, so check anything you rely on against your primary resources.
Can I rely on the cards being accurate?
Cards are created from publicly available sources and may contain errors. Check anything you rely on against your official materials. We're not experts in every field we cover, and NoReread does not guarantee exam results.
Is NoReread affiliated with the organizations behind these exams?
No. NoReread is not affiliated with or endorsed by the organizations whose exams and outlines it references, and exam names are trademarks of their respective owners.
How can I try it?
Every program page shows 6 free sample cards per deck. The All-Access annual plan starts with 7 days free, then $119.99/year, or you can buy a single program for life from $7.99.
Exam names are trademarks of their respective owners. Content disclaimer · All the research
Study the USMLE, PANCE and MCAT the way memory works
7 days free, then $119.99/yr for every program · cancel anytime · or one program for life from $7.99